Recognize a stratagem without losing the question
Use Eristic Dialectic to notice when discussion leaves relevant reasons behind.
An original introduction. This guide accompanies the work; it is neither the complete text nor a translation.
Identify the actual claim
Write down one precise proposition before examining replies. Many stratagems expand or shift a claim until defending it becomes impossible. A useful first response returns to the words actually used instead of accepting a distorted replacement.
Separate proof from impression
A brilliant phrase, cited authority or applauding audience can create an impression of victory. Ask what connects these things to the proposition. Relevant expertise may provide evidence; unrelated prestige does not supply the missing argument.
Choose a constructive response
Recognizing a personal attack does not require repeating it. Name the shift, request evidence or suspend the exchange. The purpose is to restore an intelligible inquiry rather than turn every conversation into a contest for domination.
Protect the question, the reasons and the possibility of being corrected.
Your turn to think.
- What evidence would make you admit your claim is false?
- When does continuing a discussion still improve understanding?
Your selection and progress stay in this browser.