Work · David Hume

An Abstract of the Treatise of Human Nature

This anonymous presentation selects causation to make the Treatise’s project accessible and explain how habit organizes our inferences.

01 / Context & transmission

Understanding the text

Attribution to Hume is now widely accepted; the Abstract is not a balanced condensation of all three books.

02 / Key points

Key points

  1. 01

    Example

    Two colliding billiard balls isolate the difference between observing succession and knowing necessity.

  2. 02

    Inference

    Past experience supplies no logical demonstration of nature’s future uniformity.

  3. 03

    Belief

    The force with which an idea is conceived helps distinguish believing from merely imagining.

03 / How to read it

How to read it

Read it after the Treatise’s sections on causation. Identify presentational choices aimed at a new reader and the matters the summary leaves aside.

04 / Editions & sources

Editions & sources

Summaries and key points are original editorial interpretations. They accompany reading the work and do not replace an edition of the text. Editorial method ↗

Continue exploring the texts
1739–1740

A Treatise of Human Nature

1748; titre 1758

An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding

Back to the bibliography