Dao De Jing
The collection took shape in ancient China; its manuscripts, versions and textual layers remain debated. Traditional attribution to Laozi does not establish individual authorship.
Explore this workVisit the source(new tab)Act without imposing force.
Works, testimonies and further readings are distinguished. Dates refer to composition or first publication, as specified in each entry.
The Dao De Jing is traditionally attributed to Laozi, whose authorship remains disputed. The two later religious texts are presented as testimony to reception, not authenticated books. This selection does not inventory every commentary or manuscript.
The collection took shape in ancient China; its manuscripts, versions and textual layers remain debated. Traditional attribution to Laozi does not establish individual authorship.
Explore this workVisit the source(new tab)Transmitted in fragmentary and revised forms, this scripture belongs to a later religious history. It is not an authenticated work by the ancient philosopher.
Explore this workVisit the source(new tab)A work of medieval Daoist tradition, it is traditionally associated with Laozi but cannot be assigned to the ancient figure as its historical author.
Explore this workVisit the source(new tab)